In the world of public health, a good intention is never enough. You might launch a nationwide vaccination campaign or a local nutrition initiative, but how do you know if it actually worked? Evaluation of Health Programmes is the rigorous, scientific process of measuring impact. It is the difference between guessing that a project is successful and proving it with data. It is the discipline that asks: Did we spend the money wisely, and did we actually save lives?
Below is the exam paper download link
PDF Past Paper On Evaluation Of Health Programmes For Revision
Above is the exam paper download link
For students in global health, epidemiology, and health management, “Evaluation” is often the most technical part of the syllabus. It requires a blend of statistical logic, social understanding, and financial auditing. To help you navigate the “Logic Models” and “Indicator Frameworks” of your upcoming exam, we’ve prepared a high-impact Q&A guide and a direct link to a comprehensive PDF past paper for your revision.
Measuring Impact: Questions and Answers
Q1: What is the fundamental difference between ‘Monitoring’ and ‘Evaluation’ (M&E)? This is the starting point for every exam. Monitoring is the continuous, day-to-day tracking of a project (e.g., How many mosquito nets did we give out today?). Evaluation is the periodic, deeper dive into the “Why” and “How” (e.g., Did those nets actually lead to a 20% decrease in malaria cases over two years?). Monitoring tracks the process; Evaluation judges the result.
Q2: How does a ‘Logic Model’ or ‘Theory of Change’ help an evaluator? A Logic Model is a visual map that connects your resources (Inputs) to your activities, your immediate results (Outputs), and your long-term changes (Outcomes). It forces an evaluator to look for the “broken link” in the chain. If the inputs were there but the outcomes failed, the Logic Model helps you identify exactly where the program lost its way.
Q3: What is ‘Formative Evaluation’ versus ‘Summative Evaluation’? Timing is everything. Formative Evaluation happens during the program; it’s like a chef tasting the soup while it’s still on the stove so they can add more salt. Summative Evaluation happens at the end; it’s the final critique of the meal once it has been served. In an exam, make sure you can explain when to use each to improve program delivery.
Q4: What are ‘Performance Indicators’ and what makes them “SMART”? Indicators are the yardsticks of success. To be effective, they must be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. If your indicator is just “improve health,” you will fail your evaluation. If your indicator is “reduce maternal mortality by 15% in the Rift Valley by December 2026,” you have a measurable target.
Q5: Why is ‘Cost-Effectiveness Analysis’ (CEA) so important in health evaluation? In public health, resources are always limited. CEA doesn’t just ask if a program worked; it asks if it was the cheapest way to get that result. If Program A saves a life for $100 and Program B saves a life for $1,000, an evaluator must use this data to help policymakers choose the most efficient path.
Why You Need This Evaluation Past Paper
Evaluation is a subject of “Evidence and Logic.” You might understand the concept of a “Randomized Controlled Trial,” but can you design a “Baseline Survey” or calculate an “Impact Factor” under the pressure of a ticking exam clock?
By using the PDF past paper linked below, you can:
-
Master the Frameworks: Practice drawing “Problem Trees” and “Objective Trees” quickly and accurately.
-
Refine Your Quantitative Skills: Get comfortable interpreting “P-values” and “Confidence Intervals” within a health context.
-
Identify Common Pitfalls: Learn how to spot “Bias” in survey data—a favorite topic for examiners.
Access Your Revision Resource
The ability to prove that a health program works is the most valuable skill a public health professional can have. Click the link below to download the full past paper and start your journey toward mastering the science of impact.
Don’t just read the theories—analyze the data sets. Work through the case studies, understand the stakeholder perspectives, and use this paper to build the confidence you need for a top grade. Good luck!
Last updated on: March 30, 2026