Let’s be honest: sitting in a lecture hall and discussing the philosophy of Tyler or Taba is one thing; facing a blank exam booklet with a ticking clock is another beast entirely. If you are pursuing a career in education, Curriculum Development is the backbone of your profession. It’s the “how” and “why” behind every lesson taught globally.
Below is the exam paper download link
Past Paper On Curriculum Development For Revision
Above is the exam paper download link
However, the sheer volume of theories, models, and evaluation strategies can feel overwhelming. That is why we’ve curated a goldmine for your revision. Below, we break down the core concepts you’ll likely encounter, and most importantly, we provide a link to download the actual past papers to test your mettle.
Why Use Past Papers for Revision?
Before we dive into the Q&A, let’s talk strategy. Why hunt for past papers?
-
-
Pattern Recognition: Examiners have “favorites.” You’ll notice certain themes—like the difference between syllabus and curriculum—pop up every few years.
-
Timing: It’s one thing to know the answer; it’s another to write it in 15 minutes.
-
Confidence: Nothing kills exam anxiety like seeing a question and thinking, “I’ve answered this before.”
-
Essential Q&A: Curriculum Development 101
To get your brain in “exam mode,” here are some high-frequency questions and concise, high-scoring answers.
Q1: What is the fundamental difference between ‘Curriculum’ and ‘Syllabus’?
Many students use these interchangeably, but in an exam, that’s a costly mistake. A Syllabus is a narrow list of subjects or topics to be covered in a specific course. A Curriculum is the total experience—it includes the syllabus, the teaching methods, the extracurricular activities, and the underlying values the school intends to instill.
Q2: Compare the ‘Product’ vs. ‘Process’ models of curriculum.
The Product Model (often associated with Ralph Tyler) is all about the end goal. It’s rigid, measurable, and focused on whether students hit specific benchmarks. The Process Model, on the other hand, focuses on the how of learning. It emphasizes the interaction between the teacher and the student, valuing the journey and the development of thinking skills over a simple “pass/fail” grade.