Let’s be real: sitting for an Ethics and Christian Morality exam can feel like navigating a minefield of “gray areas.” One minute you’re discussing the absolute laws of the Ten Commandments, and the next, you’re trying to justify a difficult medical decision using the Principle of Double Effect.
Below is the exam paper download link
Past Paper On Ethics And Christian Morality For Revision
Above is the exam paper download link
This subject isn’t just about being a “good person”; it’s a rigorous academic study of how we decide what is right. It’s the tension between ancient scripture and modern dilemmas like AI ethics, euthanasia, and social justice. If you want to move from “well, I think…” to “according to the Categorical Imperative…”, you need to see how these theories are tested in the real world. To help you prep, we’ve tackled the high-stakes questions found in the most recent past papers.
The Revision Q&A: Deciphering the Right and the Good
Q: What is the difference between ‘Absolutism’ and ‘Relativism’ in a Christian context? This is the fundamental divide in your syllabus.
-
Absolutism: The belief that certain actions are always right or always wrong, regardless of the situation. Think of the Ten Commandments or Natural Law.
-
Relativism: The idea that the “right” thing depends on the circumstances. In Christian circles, this is often linked to Situation Ethics (Joseph Fletcher), where the only absolute is Agape (unconditional love).
Q: How does Aquinas’ ‘Natural Law’ work in modern ethical debates? Thomas Aquinas argued that God gave us reason to discover the “Primary Precepts” of human life, such as protecting the innocent and living in an ordered society.
In an exam, you’ll often be asked to apply this to “Bioethics.” If an action goes against a primary precept (like the preservation of life), Natural Law usually forbids it, even if the intention is to end suffering.
Q: What is ‘Divine Command Theory’ and what is its biggest flaw? This theory argues that an action is good simply because God commands it. While it provides a clear “rulebook,” examiners love to see you mention the Euthyphro Dilemma: Is something good because God commands it, or does God command it because it is inherently good? If you can explain that tension, you’re already in the top percentile of students.
Q: How do Utilitarianism and Christian Ethics clash? Utilitarianism (Bentham/Mill) focuses on “the greatest good for the greatest number.”
-
The Conflict: Christianity often focuses on the value of the individual and the marginalized, even if sacrificing them would benefit the majority.
-
The Exam Strategy: When a past paper asks you to evaluate a social policy, compare the Utilitarian “cost-benefit” approach with the Christian “Sanctity of Life” approach.
The Power of the Past Paper: Your Ethical Blueprint
You can read the Bible or Aristotle all day, but Ethics is a “skills-based” subject. You need to know how to build a logical argument, anticipate a counter-argument, and reach a balanced conclusion—all while the exam clock is ticking.
By downloading our Ethics and Christian Morality past paper, you will:
-
Master the Vocabulary: Practice using terms like Eudaimonia, Proportionalism, and Synderesis correctly.
-
Refine Your Case Studies: Learn how to apply Virtue Ethics to a contemporary issue like environmental stewardship.
-
Identify Trends: You’ll notice that questions on Global Poverty and Capital Punishment are recurring favorites in 2026.
Download Your Revision Material Here
Ready to turn your moral intuition into academic excellence? Don’t leave your grades to “good intentions.” The best way to build your confidence is to tackle the dilemmas that have challenged theologians and philosophers for centuries. Use the link below to download a curated past paper.
[Click Here to Download the Ethics and Christian Morality Past Paper PDF]
A Quick Parting Tip: The ‘Four Working Principles’
Whenever you’re stuck on a question about Situation Ethics, remember Fletcher’s four principles: Pragmatism, Relativism, Positivism, and Personalism. If you can show that you prioritize “people over rules” (Personalism), you’ve captured the heart of the theory.
